Jump To Navigation

Current News

News

Business

[07/14] Doctors hopeful easier blood thinners are nearing
[07/11] Fire engulfs commercial boatyard on Maine coast
[07/08] State ethics commission probes WVU degree scandal
[07/02] Fugitive hedge-fund swindler surrenders in Mass.
[06/30] Oil is making millionaires in North Dakota

More...

Litigation

[07/22] HP-EDS deal price at issue in court hearing
[07/22] Court tosses FCC 'wardrobe malfunction' fine
[07/21] Court tosses FCC 'wardrobe malfunction' fine
[07/21] Medically unfit truck drivers still on roads
[07/21] NTSB's 8 proposals to bar medically unfit drivers

More...

Insurance

[07/22] UnitedHealth 2Q profit falls on charges, tops view
[07/21] Medically unfit truck drivers still on roads
[07/21] NTSB's 8 proposals to bar medically unfit drivers
[07/18] Small plane crash near Tampa kills 3
[07/18] Several teenagers injured in Utah bus crash

More...

Real Estate

[07/22] Treasury: Swift support needed for mortgage giants
[07/22] Mortgage giant rescue could cost $25b
[07/22] Lawmakers move to curb Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac pay
[07/21] Reality trumps ideology in Fannie-Freddie rescue
[07/18] Freddie Mac takes step toward issuing stock

More...

Case Summaries

Family Law

[07/22] In re Esmeralda S.
Juvenile court's order terminating defendant-mother's parental rights to her child is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) defendant's due process rights were violated when the juvenile court appointed her a guardian ad litem; and 2) the juvenile court did not properly inquire into her and the minor's father's possible American Indian ancestry for purposes of complying with Indian Child Welfare Act.

[07/18] In re Brandon T.
Order terminating mother's parental rights over her child is affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that the minor was specifically adoptable by his relative caretakers; 2) the Indian Child Welfare Act does not require more than one expert at a section 366.26 hearing; 3) there was sufficient evidence that continued custody would result in serious emotional or physical harm to the minor; and 4) mother was not prejudiced by a lack of evidence in regard to prevailing social and cultural standards of the minor's tribe.

[07/18] Duran v. Beaumont
Dismissal of a motion for the return of petitioner's daughter to Chile is affirmed where, for purposes of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, petitioner had only access rights, not custody rights, leaving the district court without jurisdiction to order the return of the child.

[07/16] In re Marriage of Sonne
In a marriage dissolution proceeding, a conclusion that repurchased service credits for husband's years of service to his employer prior to his wife were community property is affirmed where the repurchase of service credits involved the commingling of separate and community property in the use of community funds to purchase the service credits. However, assignation to the wife of the entire survivor benefit of which she was the irrevocable beneficiary is reversed and remanded where the husband was only compensated for the cost of the survivor benefits when its value far exceeded its cost.

[06/30] Harper v. Division of Family Services
In a parental right adjudicatory proceeding, the court's decision to terminate respondent's parental rights and transfer of the minor to the Division of Family Services is affirmed where: 1) there was clear and convincing evidence to terminate parental rights; and 2) the state was able to prove that termination of parental rights was in the minor's best interest.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.